On 19 November 2017 at 02:40, Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilai...@gmail.com> wrote: > The issue submission talks about ranges that have InputIterators > as their iterator type. Even without any such range types, the added > test more or less shows that it's draconian to require a ForwardIterator > in std::next, since it seems perfectly reasonable to be able to std::next() > an iterator of an istream. > > Testing on Linux-PPC64, ok for trunk if the full suite passes?
The test run is squeaky clean and verified to have run the added test.
