On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 11:46:48 +0000 Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 16/11/17 10:57 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > >On 16/11/17 08:51 +0300, Petr Ovtchenkov wrote: > >>On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 22:19:22 +0100 > >>François Dumont <frs.dum...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>>Hi > >>> > >>> Any final decision regarding this patch ? > >>> > >>>François > >> > >>https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2017-11/msg00036.html > >>https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2017-11/msg00035.html > >>https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2017-11/msg00037.html > >>https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2017-11/msg00034.html > > > >It would be helpful if you two could collaborate and come up with a > >good solution, or at least discuss the pros and cons, instead of just > >sending competing patches. > > > Let me be more clear: I'm not going to review further patches in this > area while you two are proposing different alternatives, without > commenting on each other's approach. > > If you think your solution is better than François's solution, you > should explain why, not just send a different patch. If François > thinks his solution is better than yours, he should state why, not > just send a different patch. > > I don't have time to infer all that from just your patches, so I'm not > going to bother. > References here is a notification that - there is another opinion; - discussion is in another thread. Nothing more.
