On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 2:33 AM, Tom Tromey <t...@tromey.com> wrote: > I'm still [not] too happy with the error message, so if you have any > suggestions there, please let me know. I removed the "C99" branch from > the earlier error message as well, since this isn't a C feature at all. > Again, please check the wording.
I'm ambivalent about mentioning the standard level. And I find the use of "expansion" in this and the existing __VA_ARGS__ error odd, as expansion is what you *do* with a macro; I'd prefer "definition". But I suppose we might as well be consistent with the existing error. The patch is OK, thanks. Jason
