>>> On 05.10.11 at 10:54, Jan Hubicka <j...@suse.de> wrote:
>>> we have, like specifying the set of symbols _defined_ by a toplevel
>>> asm, right? I might misremember but sth like
>>>
>>> extern void foo (void);
>>> asm("" :::: "foo");
>>>
>>> was supposed to do the trick. Or should we treat those as outputs
>>> (given you use inputs for symbol uses)?
>>
>> I don't recall any discussion of how to deal with symbols defined by a
>> top level asm - I was just asked to follow the "normal" asm syntax in
>> having two colons in the middle instead of one as I had originally (not
>> expecting any use for outputs here).
>>
>>> Honza, do you remember if we decided on anything here?
>
> To be honest, I don't think we actually dicussed some particular
> syntax or my memory is even worse ;). We will need to make one.
> In the above example, I don't think quotes about foo is needed. We
> actualy provide definition of the declaration, so it should be just
> the decl itself, not a string.
With there not being a clear direction (and me not having the time
to extend what I have currently), is there any chance that what's
there could go in then, for someone else to extend?
Thanks, Jan
> Honza
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Richard.
>>
>>
>>
