On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Janis Johnson wrote: > On 10/10/2011 06:23 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, Janis Johnson wrote: > > > >> This patch skips several Power-specific tests if hard_float support > >> isn't available. OK for trunk? > > > > It looks like these are testing for particular instructions using FPRs and > > so powerpc_fprs is more appropriate; you don't want to match e500v2 hard > > float. > > Is a patch using powerpc_fprs instead of hard_float OK for these tests?
OK in the absence of testsuite or target maintainer objections within 24 hours. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
