On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 01:05:21PM -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
>
>
> On 10/12/2017 12:49 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 06:41:05PM -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> > > > Tested on x86_64-linux -m32/-m64, and verified with cc1plus before your
> > > > change, ok for trunk?
> > BTW, I think it is quite fragile to scan for the reload messages, so I've
> > cooked up a runtime test that fails before your patch and succeeds with your
> > patch. Tested on x86_64-linux with -m32/-m64 (both with your patch reverted
> > and without), ok for trunk?
> >
> >
> OK.
Thanks.
> FYI, I am going to revert LRA part of the patch because it results in a
> failure bootstrap with go or ada. I guess the new version of the patch will
> be ready tomorrow or on Monday.
Yeah, I've just noticed that too (my bootstrap failed in Ada). I'll defer
committing the patch after you commit your new fix then.
Jakub
