> It isn't a standoff, we can choose to just fix the issue and be compatible, > if we want.
I guess you're right and I'm probably using the wrong word - English is not my first language. ;-) But I meant that they could have made the same choice to be compatible (by fixing the issue in their compiler and making their GCC-compatible ABI output actually compatible with GCC; they already have other, clang-only, GCC-incompatible ABIs in there, so why not make the GCC-compatible one actually compatible with GCC ?), but they didn't. Anyhow I completely agree with you that life is too short and we spent already way too much time discussing this. It's fixed and let's move on. :-) Thanks
