On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 02:30:16PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> Here is the revised amo.h. I tested the two test files amo1.c and amo2.c, and
> they both compile. It is interesting, use %P0 results in fewer addi's than
> the
> older one (there were redunant addi's in passing the address). Can I check it
> in?
>
> [gcc]
> 2017-10-06 Michael Meissner <[email protected]>
>
> * config/rs6000/amo.h: New include file to provide ISA 3.0 atomic
> memory operation instruction support.
> * config.gcc (powerpc*-*-*): Include amo.h as an extra header.
> (rs6000-ibm-aix[789]*): Likewise.
> * doc/extend.texi (PowerPC Atomic Memory Operation Functions):
> Document new functions.
>
> [gcc/testsuite]
> 2017-10-06 Michael Meissner <[email protected]>
>
> * gcc.target/powerpc/amo1.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/amo2.c: Likewise.
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/amo1.c (revision 0)
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/amo1.c (revision 0)
> @@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile { target { powerpc64*-*-* && lp64 } } } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_p9vector_ok } */
> +/* { dg-options "-mpower9-vector -mpower9-misc -O2" } */
Should this be powerpc*-*-* instead?
Okay for trunk with that taken care of. Thanks!
Segher
