On 6 October 2017 at 09:45, Tamar Christina <tamar.christ...@arm.com> wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Rainer Orth [mailto:r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de] >> Sent: 05 October 2017 20:16 >> To: Tamar Christina >> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd; James Greenhalgh; Richard Earnshaw; >> Marcus Shawcroft >> Subject: Re: [PATCH][GCC][testsuite][mid-end][ARM][AARCH64] Fix failing >> vec align tests. >> >> Hi Tamar, >> >> > Previously I had corrected the vect_hw_misalign check which prompted >> > these three test to start failing because the condition needs to be >> > inverted in the testcases. >> > >> > Regtested on aarch64-none-elf, arm-none-linux-gnueabihf and x86_64-pc- >> linux-gnu. >> > >> > Ok for trunk? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Tamar. >> > >> > gcc/testsuite/ >> > 2017-10-02 Tamar Christina <tamar.christ...@arm.com> >> > >> > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-align-1.c: Fix vect_hw_misalign condition. >> > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-align-2.c: Likewise. >> > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-multitypes-1.c: Likewise. >> >> unfortunately, your patch caused gcc.dg/vect/vect-multitypes-1.c to FAIL on >> sparc-sun-solaris2.11 (32 and 64-bit): >> >> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-multitypes-1.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects >> scan-tree-dump- >> times vect "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 4 >> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-multitypes-1.c scan-tree-dump-times vect >> "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 4 > > Thanks! I'll take a look. >
If that's easier for you, I've noticed the same thing on armeb-none-linux-gnueabihf --with-mode arm --with-cpu cortex-a9 --with-fpu neon-fp16 Christophe > Tamar > >> >> It had XFAILed before. >> >> Rainer >> >> -- >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
