On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Jeff Law wrote: > /* Copyright (c) 2010-2014 by Digital Mars > * All Rights Reserved, written by Walter Bright > * http://www.digitalmars.com > * Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0. > * (See accompanying file LICENSE or copy at > http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt) > > If the code was assigned to the FSF in 2011, then the FSF would have > ownership of the code. And the FSF would be the only entity that could > change the license (which according to your message changed to Boost in > 2014). So something seems wrong here.
The standard FSF assignment would allow the contributor to distribute their own code under such terms as they see fit. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
