David Edelsohn <dje....@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 2:53 AM, Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Sep 2017, David Edelsohn wrote:
>>
>>> * tree-ssa-sccvn.c (visit_phi): Merge undefined values similar
>>> to VN_TOP.
>>>
>>> This seems to have regressed
>>>
>>> FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/time-profiler-2.c scan-ipa-dump-times profile
>>> "Read tp_first_run: 0" 2
>>> FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/time-profiler-2.c scan-ipa-dump-times profile
>>> "Read tp_first_run: 2" 1
>>> FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/time-profiler-2.c scan-ipa-dump-times profile
>>> "Read tp_first_run: 3" 1
>>
>> Hmm, I don't see these FAILs. Looking at the testcase there are
>> no undefined uses so I wonder how the patch could have any effect.
>>
>> Can you re-check and open a bugreport?
>
> It disappeared again. A different failure appeared and disappeared a
> few weeks ago. Something in the testsuite infrastructure appears to
> not be stable, at least on AIX. Sorry for the incorrect report.
Perhaps this is unrelated, but when doing the "has this patch
changed assembly on these targets?" testing, I noticed that AIX
had differences like:
--- old/powerpc-ibm-aix7.0/test/-O3/g++.dg/init/constant1.s
+++ new/powerpc-ibm-aix7.0/test/-O3/g++.dg/init/constant1.s
@@ -4,21 +4,21 @@
.csect ..text.startup[PR],2
.align 2
.align 4
- .globl
_GLOBAL__I_65535_0_.._.._.._testsuite_g__.dg_._init_constant1.C_00000000_0xbb0d20e181e3a401
- .globl
._GLOBAL__I_65535_0_.._.._.._testsuite_g__.dg_._init_constant1.C_00000000_0xbb0d20e181e3a401
- .csect
_GLOBAL__I_65535_0_.._.._.._testsuite_g__.dg_._init_constant1.C_00000000_0xbb0d20e181e3a401[DS]
-_GLOBAL__I_65535_0_.._.._.._testsuite_g__.dg_._init_constant1.C_00000000_0xbb0d20e181e3a401:
- .long
._GLOBAL__I_65535_0_.._.._.._testsuite_g__.dg_._init_constant1.C_00000000_0xbb0d20e181e3a401,
TOC[tc0], 0
+ .globl
_GLOBAL__I_65535_0_.._.._.._testsuite_g__.dg_._init_constant1.C_00000000_0x5610f7ec143966c9
+ .globl
._GLOBAL__I_65535_0_.._.._.._testsuite_g__.dg_._init_constant1.C_00000000_0x5610f7ec143966c9
+ .csect
_GLOBAL__I_65535_0_.._.._.._testsuite_g__.dg_._init_constant1.C_00000000_0x5610f7ec143966c9[DS]
+_GLOBAL__I_65535_0_.._.._.._testsuite_g__.dg_._init_constant1.C_00000000_0x5610f7ec143966c9:
+ .long
._GLOBAL__I_65535_0_.._.._.._testsuite_g__.dg_._init_constant1.C_00000000_0x5610f7ec143966c9,
TOC[tc0], 0
even though -frandom-seed is forced to the same value for both runs.
Is this behaviour deliberate? I thought runs from a few weeks ago
had stable names, but maybe I just misremember.
Thanks,
Richard
