On 7 September 2017 at 17:18, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote: > Does anybody object to this change? Is getting a #error still useful, > given the existence of __has_include and __cpp_lib macros?
I wholeheartedly agree with this change. And I should point out that vast amounts of optional's implementation are my handiwork, and that I consider myself the maintainer of optional, even though I don't officially have such status. ;)
