On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 5:39 PM, Xi Ruoyao <r...@stu.xidian.edu.cn> wrote: > On 2017-08-21 23:37 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote: >> On 2017-04-25 09:30 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: >> > On 04/14/2017 06:44 PM, Xi Ruoyao wrote: >> > > On 2017-04-14 15:00 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote: >> > > > On 2017-04-13 09:05 +0200, Richard Biener wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Did you verify LTO bootstrap still works with the patch? >> > > > >> > > > I've just done a LTO bootstrapp (boarding a train :) ). >> > > > It works with my patch. >> > > >> > > I've done dejagnu tests in lto.exp and built a Linux kernel >> > > with lto bootstrapped GCC. They seem good. >> > >> > Given Richi's general agreement around the in_lto_p, let's go with the >> > patch on the trunk only. >> > >> > If you get positive feedback from Jan, then this can be backported to >> > gcc-7 after it's been on the trunk for at least a week. >> >> We have 15 weeks now :) >> >> Re-tested on gcc-7-branch with lto-bootstrap. No regressions. Is it >> OK to backport this to gcc-7-branch? > > I was too stupid so I didn't attach the patch :( > > It's attached here.
Ok for the gcc 7 branch. Thanks, Richard. > -- > Xi Ruoyao <r...@stu.xidian.edu.cn> > School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
