On Jul 10 2017, Maxim Ostapenko <m.ostape...@samsung.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/gcc/asan.c b/gcc/asan.c
> index 95004d7..89c2731 100644
> --- a/gcc/asan.c
> +++ b/gcc/asan.c
> @@ -1567,9 +1567,10 @@ asan_emit_allocas_unpoison (rtx top, rtx bot, rtx_insn
> *before)
> else
> start_sequence ();
> rtx ret = init_one_libfunc ("__asan_allocas_unpoison");
> + top = convert_memory_address (ptr_mode, top);
> + bot = convert_memory_address (ptr_mode, bot);
> ret = emit_library_call_value (ret, NULL_RTX, LCT_NORMAL, ptr_mode, 2, top,
> - TYPE_MODE (pointer_sized_int_node), bot,
> - TYPE_MODE (pointer_sized_int_node));
> + ptr_mode, bot, ptr_mode);
There is another similar occurence:
/opt/gcc/gcc-20170711/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/asan/pr80168.c:7:1: internal
compiler error: in emit_library_call_value_1, at calls.c:4555
0x701577 emit_library_call_value_1
../../gcc/calls.c:4554
0x7068d7 emit_library_call_value(rtx_def*, rtx_def*, libcall_type,
machine_mode, int, ...)
../../gcc/calls.c:5159
0x6f2307 expand_asan_emit_allocas_unpoison
../../gcc/builtins.c:4978
0x6f2307 expand_builtin(tree_node*, rtx_def*, rtx_def*, machine_mode, int)
../../gcc/builtins.c:6787
0x81fa6f expand_expr_real_1(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
expand_modifier, rtx_def**, bool)
../../gcc/expr.c:10841
0x716517 expand_expr
../../gcc/expr.h:276
0x716517 expand_call_stmt
../../gcc/cfgexpand.c:2664
0x716517 expand_gimple_stmt_1
../../gcc/cfgexpand.c:3583
0x716517 expand_gimple_stmt
../../gcc/cfgexpand.c:3749
0x719077 expand_gimple_basic_block
../../gcc/cfgexpand.c:5753
0x71dfc7 execute
../../gcc/cfgexpand.c:6360
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
