Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> writes: > So then this change would make > > _Complex c; > > OK, but not > > static _Complex c; > > because the first declspec is not from a macro, right?
Yes.
>
>> I believe you noted this at some point and
>> agreed with me that ideally each declspec should come with its location
>> but that's work for another occasion.
>
> If I'm right about the above example, I think I'd rather hold off this
> declspecs change until that time.
OK.
--
Dodji
