On 10/04/2011 09:28 AM, Tom de Vries wrote: > Well, that was the idea. But now I wonder, isn't it better to do this in > expand_builtin_alloca: > ... > /* Compute the argument. */ > op0 = expand_normal (CALL_EXPR_ARG (exp, 0)); > > + align = > + (DECL_FUNCTION_CODE (get_callee_fndecl (exp)) == > + BUILT_IN_ALLOCA_WITH_ALIGN) > + ? TREE_INT_CST_LOW (CALL_EXPR_ARG (exp, 1)) > + : BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT; > + > + > /* Allocate the desired space. */ > - result = allocate_dynamic_stack_space (op0, 0, BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT, > - cannot_accumulate); > + result = allocate_dynamic_stack_space (op0, 0, align, cannot_accumulate);
Yes, this is better. I've lost track of what you're trying to do with "folding" alloca? r~
