On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi! > > As C++17 decided to rename decompositions to structured bindings, this > patch attempts to adjust the diagnostics by replacing > "decomposition declaration" with "structured binding". > Or shall I use "structured binding declaration" instead (or is that too > longer/verbose), or something different?
"structured binding declaration" is better when you're talking about the declaration syntax. When you're talking about the feature in the first hunk, "structured bindings". "structured binding variable" is good in the one hunk where you've used that. Jason
