Re: [patch][Ping #3] PR80929: Realistic PARALLEL cost in seq_cost.

[Wilco Dijkstra]

Georg-Johann Lay wrote:

@@ -5300,6 +5300,9 @@ seq_cost (const rtx_insn *seq, bool spee
       set = single_set (seq);
       if (set)
         cost += set_rtx_cost (set, speed);
+      else if (INSN_P (seq)
+              && PARALLEL == GET_CODE (PATTERN (seq)))
+       cost += insn_rtx_cost (PATTERN (seq), speed);
       else
         cost++;

insn_rtx_cost may return zero if it can't find something useful in the 
parallel, 
which means it may return a lower cost and even zero. Not sure whether this
is important, but in eg. combine a cost of zero means infinite and so could have
unintended consequences. So incrementing cost with a non-zero value 
if insn_rtx_cost == 0 would seem safer.

Also why does the else do cost++ and not cost += COSTS_N_INSNS (1)?

Wilco