On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 6:32 AM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > The following patch fixes it by allowing that wording too on the line 10. > Is this ok for trunk or do you have some other preference?
OK, thanks. Jason
- C++ PATCH for c++/81073, constexpr and static var in statem... Jason Merrill
- Re: C++ PATCH for c++/81073, constexpr and static var ... Andreas Schwab
- Re: C++ PATCH for c++/81073, constexpr and static ... Jason Merrill
- Re: C++ PATCH for c++/81073, constexpr and sta... Andreas Schwab
- Re: C++ PATCH for c++/81073, constexpr and... Jakub Jelinek
- Re: C++ PATCH for c++/81073, constexp... Jason Merrill
