Hello. Sorry for this breakage, it's actually the same mistake I did in the PR that belongs to the test I broke. I overlooked the ICE in log file.
I'm testing the patch, may I install it after it survives regression tests? Martin
>From 20e5419136ec26ed009ca93eedccd2582b65dd36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: marxin <mli...@suse.cz> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:50:06 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Create an extra BB in profile-generate (PR tree-optimization/81041). gcc/ChangeLog: 2017-06-12 Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz> PR tree-optimization/81041 * tree-profile.c (gimple_gen_ic_func_profiler): Create an extra BB in profile-generate (gimple_gen_time_profiler): Likewise. --- gcc/tree-profile.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/gcc/tree-profile.c b/gcc/tree-profile.c index f5c06684402..2ae4b69b68e 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-profile.c +++ b/gcc/tree-profile.c @@ -429,6 +429,10 @@ gimple_gen_ic_func_profiler (void) basic_block cond_bb = split_edge (single_succ_edge (entry)); basic_block update_bb = split_edge (single_succ_edge (cond_bb)); + /* We need to do an extra split in order to not create an input + for a possible PHI node. */ + split_edge (single_succ_edge (update_bb)); + edge true_edge = single_succ_edge (cond_bb); true_edge->flags = EDGE_TRUE_VALUE; @@ -487,6 +491,10 @@ gimple_gen_time_profiler (unsigned tag, unsigned base) basic_block cond_bb = split_edge (single_succ_edge (entry)); basic_block update_bb = split_edge (single_succ_edge (cond_bb)); + /* We need to do an extra split in order to not create an input + for a possible PHI node. */ + split_edge (single_succ_edge (update_bb)); + edge true_edge = single_succ_edge (cond_bb); true_edge->flags = EDGE_TRUE_VALUE; true_edge->probability = PROB_UNLIKELY; -- 2.13.1
