On 02/06/17 12:19 -0700, Tim Shen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 6:07 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
As the PR points out, we aren't qualifying calls to __ref_cast, and
have 'constexpr' on function templates that can never be usable in
constant expressions.
Apology for the constexpr trolling, but that was not intentional. :)
I'm curious why no tests break. Is it because constexpr in a template
function is a no-op instead of a hard error, when the function
definition is not constexpr?
The patch looks good.
Committed to trunk (I'll backport it to gcc-7-branch some time too).
