On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 26 July 2011 10:01, Dr. David Alan Gilbert <david.gilb...@linaro.org> > wrote: >> >> + >> +extern unsigned int __write(int fd, const void *buf, unsigned int count); > > Why are we using __write instead of write? > > A comment elaborating that this file should only be in the static > libgcc and never in the dynamic libgcc would be useful, given that the > constructor is only pulled in only if a 64 bit sync primitive is > referred to. >
You may want to look a look at: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50583 ARM may have the same problem. -- H.J.
