Hello.
After discussions with Richi, I decided to end up with the transformation and
thus
I would like to apply the original patch on top of what was done. Probably last
change
should be that we should renumber TDF_* values to start from 1 << 0 and holes
in numbering
should be eliminated?
Thanks,
Martin
>From d0cab884035be37e5ceab54384611830661fdd9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: marxin <mli...@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 10:32:42 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add -fdump*-folding suboption.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2017-05-24 Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz>
* dumpfile.c: Add TDF_FOLDING.
* dumpfile.h (enum dump_kind): Likewise.
* genmatch.c (dt_simplify::gen_1): Use it.
---
gcc/dumpfile.c | 1 +
gcc/dumpfile.h | 1 +
gcc/genmatch.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/dumpfile.c b/gcc/dumpfile.c
index 13a711345b4..903d879e784 100644
--- a/gcc/dumpfile.c
+++ b/gcc/dumpfile.c
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ static const struct dump_option_value_info dump_options[] =
{"enumerate_locals", TDF_ENUMERATE_LOCALS},
{"scev", TDF_SCEV},
{"gimple", TDF_GIMPLE},
+ {"folding", TDF_FOLDING},
{"optimized", MSG_OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS},
{"missed", MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION},
{"note", MSG_NOTE},
diff --git a/gcc/dumpfile.h b/gcc/dumpfile.h
index a1e4720156d..abb4d93a93b 100644
--- a/gcc/dumpfile.h
+++ b/gcc/dumpfile.h
@@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ enum dump_kind
#define TDF_SCEV (1 << 24) /* Dump SCEV details. */
#define TDF_COMMENT (1 << 25) /* Dump lines with prefix ";;" */
#define TDF_GIMPLE (1 << 26) /* Dump in GIMPLE FE syntax */
+#define TDF_FOLDING (1 << 27) /* Dump folding details. */
#define MSG_OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS (1 << 27) /* -fopt-info optimized sources */
#define MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION (1 << 28) /* missed opportunities */
#define MSG_NOTE (1 << 29) /* general optimization info */
diff --git a/gcc/genmatch.c b/gcc/genmatch.c
index 2c3183b25af..f20e39f9158 100644
--- a/gcc/genmatch.c
+++ b/gcc/genmatch.c
@@ -3191,7 +3191,7 @@ dt_simplify::gen_1 (FILE *f, int indent, bool gimple, operand *result)
}
}
- fprintf_indent (f, indent, "if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS)) "
+ fprintf_indent (f, indent, "if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_FOLDING)) "
"fprintf (dump_file, \"Applying pattern ");
output_line_directive (f,
result ? result->location : s->match->location, true);
--
2.12.2
