Hi Jerry, This patch is good for both trunk and 7-branch.
Thanks! Paul On 11 May 2017 at 16:35, Jerry DeLisle <jvdeli...@charter.net> wrote: > And the actual patch ... > > On 05/11/2017 08:30 AM, Jerry DeLisle wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> The attached patch fixes this issue by moving the DTIO namelist checks >> from namelist resolution to READ/WRITE statement resolution. This allows >> the checks to be specific to the io_kind. The dtio_procs_present function is >> moved and modified to accept the io_kind as an argument and check for the >> specific DTIO procedure. >> >> The original dtio_procs_present function also had a segfault for one of >> the test cases because in the particular case the accessed structures do not >> exist. This is prevented by adding the appropriate guarding to avoid memory >> accesses to never never land. >> >> Several new test cases added. Regression tested on x86-64. >> >> OK for trunk. I would like to recommend back porting to 7 after allowing >> some time for testing. >> >> Regards, >> >> Jerry >> >> 2017-05-11 Jerry DeLisle <jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org> >> >> PR fortran/78659 >> * io.c (dtio_procs_present): Add new function to check for DTIO >> procedures relative to I/O statement READ or WRITE. >> (gfc_resolve_dt): Add namelist checks using the new function. >> * resolve.c (dtio_procs_present): Remove function and related >> namelist checks. (resolve_fl_namelist): Add check specific to >> Fortran 95 restriction on namelist objects. > > -- "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" - Albert Einstein
