Richard Earnshaw wrote: > - 5, /* Max cond insns. */ > + 2, /* Max cond insns. */
> This parameter is also used for A32 code. Is that really the right > number there as well? Yes, this parameter has always been the same for ARM and Thumb-2. > I do wonder if the code in arm_option_params_internal should be tweaked > to hard-limit the number of skipped insns for Thumb2 to one IT block. So You mean https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/msg01191.html ? :-) Wilco
