This is okay
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Guozhi Wei <car...@google.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> This patch removes the XPASS of test case 20040204-1.c on arm.
>
> Tested by
> on arm: make check-gcc
> RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=arm-sim/thumb/arch=armv7-a
> tree-ssa.exp=20040204-1.c"
> on x86_64: make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="tree-ssa.exp=20040204-1.c"
>
> OK for google/gcc-4_6?
>
> thanks
> Carrot
>
>
> 2011-09-27 Guozhi Wei <car...@google.com>
>
> 2011-09-07 Jiangning Liu <jiangning....@arm.com>
>
> PR tree-optimization/46021
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c: Don't XFAIL on arm*-*-*.
>
>
> Index: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c (revision 179225)
> +++ gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c (working copy)
> @@ -33,5 +33,5 @@ void test55 (int x, int y)
> that the && should be emitted (based on BRANCH_COST). Fix this
> by teaching dom to look through && and register all components
> as true. */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "link_error" 0 "optimized" { xfail { !
> "alpha*-*-* powerpc*-*-* cris-*-* crisv32-*-* hppa*-*-* i?86-*-* mmix-*-*
> mips*-*-* m68k*-*-* moxie-*-* sparc*-*-* spu-*-* x86_64-*-*" } } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "link_error" 0 "optimized" { xfail { !
> "alpha*-*-* arm*-*-* powerpc*-*-* cris-*-* crisv32-*-* hppa*-*-* i?86-*-*
> mmix-*-* mips*-*-* m68k*-*-* moxie-*-* sparc*-*-* spu-*-* x86_64-*-*" } } } }
> */
> /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "optimized" } } */
>
> --
> This patch is available for review at http://codereview.appspot.com/5139050
>
