On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 08:57:52AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> > 2017-04-19 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
> >
> > PR debug/80461
> > * dwarf2out.c (modified_type_die, gen_type_die_with_usage):
> > Check for t with zero TYPE_QUALS_NO_ADDR_SPACE.
> >
> > * g++.dg/debug/pr80461.C: New test.
> I'm going to assume your use of TYPE_QUALS_NO_ADDR_SPACE vs TYPE_QUALS or
> TYPE_QUALS_NO_ADDR_SPACE_NO_ATOMIC is correct.
I don't really know. For address space quals I think one would need to have
pointer-to-members in different code address spaces, not sure if we support
anything like that. And atomic is C only which doesn't have
pointer-to-members.
Jakub
