On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> (Jonathan, I'm going to take care of the libstdc++/doc links as
> well in case you wonder.)
Done thusly.
Jonathan, do you think one of the three references in
doc/xml/manual/abi.xml could be avoided? That'll make it easier
next time this document moves. :-}
(Also, if you could regenerate and upload the docs?)
Gerald
2017-04-12 Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com>
* doc/xml/faq.xml: Update reference link to C++ ABI for Itanium.
* doc/xml/manual/abi.xml. Ditto (thrice).
Index: doc/xml/faq.xml
===================================================================
--- doc/xml/faq.xml (revision 246859)
+++ doc/xml/faq.xml (working copy)
@@ -1213,7 +1213,7 @@
details than for C, and most CPU designers (for good reasons elaborated
below) have not stepped up to publish C++ ABIs. Such an ABI has been
defined for the Itanium architecture (see
- <link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink";
xlink:href="http://mentorembedded.github.io/cxx-abi/";>C++
+ <link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink";
xlink:href="https://itanium-cxx-abi.github.io/cxx-abi/";>C++
ABI for Itanium</link>) and that is used by G++ and other compilers
as the de facto standard ABI on many common architectures (including x86).
G++ can also use the ARM architecture's EABI, for embedded
Index: doc/xml/manual/abi.xml
===================================================================
--- doc/xml/manual/abi.xml (revision 246859)
+++ doc/xml/manual/abi.xml (working copy)
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
virtual functions, etc. These details are defined as the compiler
Application Binary Interface, or ABI. The GNU C++ compiler uses an
industry-standard C++ ABI starting with version 3. Details can be
- found in the <link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink";
xlink:href="http://mentorembedded.github.io/cxx-abi/abi.html";>ABI
+ found in the <link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink";
xlink:href="https://itanium-cxx-abi.github.io/cxx-abi/";>ABI
specification</link>.
</para>
@@ -757,7 +757,7 @@
the way the compiler deals with this class in by-value return
statements or parameters: instead of passing instances of this
class in registers, the compiler will be forced to use memory. See the
-section on <link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink";
xlink:href="http://mentorembedded.github.io/cxx-abi/abi.html#calls";>Function
+section on <link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink";
xlink:href="https://itanium-cxx-abi.github.io/cxx-abi/abi.html#calls";>Function
Calling Conventions and APIs</link>
of the C++ ABI documentation for further details.
</para></listitem>
@@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@
<biblioentry xml:id="biblio.cxxabi">
<title>
<link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink";
- xlink:href="http://mentorembedded.github.io/cxx-abi/";>
+ xlink:href="https://itanium-cxx-abi.github.io/cxx-abi/";>
C++ ABI Summary
</link>
</title>
