On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 09:47:10AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> @@ -955,6 +960,7 @@ get_alias_set (tree t)
> Just be pragmatic here and make sure the array and its element
> type get the same alias set assigned. */
> else if (TREE_CODE (t) == ARRAY_TYPE
> + && ! TYPE_TYPELESS_STORAGE (t)
> && (!TYPE_NONALIASED_COMPONENT (t)
> || TYPE_STRUCTURAL_EQUALITY_P (t)))
> set = get_alias_set (TREE_TYPE (t));
> @@ -1094,6 +1100,15 @@ get_alias_set (tree t)
>
> TYPE_ALIAS_SET (t) = set;
>
> + if (TREE_CODE (t) == ARRAY_TYPE
> + && TYPE_TYPELESS_STORAGE (t))
Shouldn't TYPE_TYPELESS_STORAGE apply even for non-array types?
If somebody chooses to store anything in long long
__attribute__((typeless_storage)), so be it. Or what kind of complications
do you see for that?
Jakub
