Hi,
as analyzed in the audit trail, it's pretty sure that this check in
get_bc_label is not serving any purpose anymore, because such
diagnostics is always (eg, also with -fsyntax-only, double checked)
produced by the parser. Thus I tested the below on x86_64-linux.
Ok for mainline?
Thanks,
Paolo.
///////////////////
2011-09-26 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com>
PR c++/26747
* cp-gimplify.c (get_bc_label): Remove obsolete diagnostics.
Index: cp-gimplify.c
===================================================================
--- cp-gimplify.c (revision 179187)
+++ cp-gimplify.c (working copy)
@@ -86,16 +86,6 @@ get_bc_label (enum bc_t bc)
{
tree label = bc_label[bc];
- if (label == NULL_TREE)
- {
- if (bc == bc_break)
- error ("break statement not within loop or switch");
- else
- error ("continue statement not within loop or switch");
-
- return NULL_TREE;
- }
-
/* Mark the label used for finish_bc_block. */
TREE_USED (label) = 1;
return label;
