On 16 March 2017 at 00:31, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote: >> emplace(_Args&&... __args) >> { >> __do_emplace<_Decay<_ValueType>> >> (std::forward<_Args>(__args)...); >> + return *(std::any_cast<_Decay<_ValueType>>(this)); > > > Can we avoid the branch in any_cast to check the stored type? > We know it's the right type, because we just stored it.
While I would hope the compiler to be smart enough to realize some of that (we are passing in this), the other branches might not be so easy. But certainly, we can axe every one of the extraneous branches, like in the attached amendment.
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/any b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/any index fff13d9..ef6efa5 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/any +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/any @@ -278,7 +278,9 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION { __do_emplace<_Decay<_ValueType>> (std::forward<_Args>(__args)...); - return *(std::any_cast<_Decay<_ValueType>>(this)); + any::_Arg __arg; + this->_M_manager(any::_Op_access, this, &__arg); + return *static_cast<_Decay<_ValueType>*>(__arg._M_obj); } /// Emplace with an object created from @p __il and @p __args as @@ -292,7 +294,9 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION { __do_emplace<_Decay<_ValueType>, _Up> (__il, std::forward<_Args>(__args)...); - return *(std::any_cast<_Decay<_ValueType>>(this)); + any::_Arg __arg; + this->_M_manager(any::_Op_access, this, &__arg); + return *static_cast<_Decay<_ValueType>*>(__arg._M_obj); } // modifiers diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/any/misc/any_cast_neg.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/any/misc/any_cast_neg.cc index 2d2b3d3..8e3ca73 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/any/misc/any_cast_neg.cc +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/any/misc/any_cast_neg.cc @@ -26,5 +26,5 @@ void test01() using std::any_cast; const any y(1); - any_cast<int&>(y); // { dg-error "invalid static_cast" "" { target { *-*-* } } 461 } + any_cast<int&>(y); // { dg-error "invalid static_cast" "" { target { *-*-* } } 465 } }