On 03/13/2017 06:29 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> O, sorry. I should have let Nick known about the gdb regressions I found.
> Besides this patch gdb needs the following one-liner fix:
>
> diff --git a/gdb/cp-name-parser.y b/gdb/cp-name-parser.y
> index fd1e949..5278c05 100644
> --- a/gdb/cp-name-parser.y
> +++ b/gdb/cp-name-parser.y
> @@ -201,6 +201,7 @@ make_empty (enum demangle_component_type d_type)
> {
> struct demangle_component *ret = d_grab ();
> ret->type = d_type;
> + ret->d_printing = 0;
> return ret;
> }
Should gdb be memsetting instead to avoid having to know about
libiberty's "internals"? Either version is pre-approved for GDB.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
