Hi, On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 02:42:58PM -0800, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Hi Martin, > > at first I was surprised to see two suggestions from -- until I > realized those came from the two (Martins) of you. ;-) > > On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, Martin Jambor wrote: > > on top of your patch, I would like to propose the following. What do > > you think? > > > > Index: changes.html > > =================================================================== > > + <code>-Os</code>). This optimization and its option supersede > > + interprocedural alignment propagation of gcc 6, and therefore the > > + option <code>-fipa-cp-alignment</code> is now deprecated and > > + ignored.</li> > > Make it "GCC 6" (all uppercase) and consider just saying "This > supersedes" or "This optimization supersedes", and I'll think I > like it. :-) >
thanks for the review, I have committed the following then. Martin Index: changes.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-7/changes.html,v retrieving revision 1.69 diff -u -r1.69 changes.html --- changes.html 28 Feb 2017 08:11:56 -0000 1.69 +++ changes.html 28 Feb 2017 09:50:20 -0000 @@ -67,7 +67,10 @@ the call graph. It is enabled by the <code>-fipa-bit-cp</code> option if <code>-fipa-cp</code> is enabled as well, and is enabled at the <code>-O2</code> optimization level and higher (and - <code>-Os</code>).</li> + <code>-Os</code>). This optimization supersedes interprocedural + alignment propagation of GCC 6, and therefore the + option <code>-fipa-cp-alignment</code> is now deprecated and + ignored.</li> <li>A new interprocedural value range propagation optimization has been added, which propagates integral ranges that variable values can be proven
