On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Jakub Jelinek <[email protected]> wrote: > This patch does a few things: > 2) all but one error in potential_constant_expression_1 to error_at with > location_of (t)
I'd prefer to calculate the location once at the top of the function rather than at every call to error_at. Given that, I think EXPR_LOC_OR_LOC is better than location_of, as the latter will give the wrong result for a decl. OK with that change. Jason
