The testcases pr59833.c and pr61441.c check whether signaling NaNs as
input to some operation result in quiet NaNs. Without -fsignaling-nans
this is not guaranteed to happen. So, this patch add this option to
these testcases.
Tested on powerpc64-linux {-m32,-m64}, on aarch64-linux, and on
x86_64-linux (where there is no issignaling, huh -- I tested on gcc20).
Is this okay for trunk?
Segher
2017-02-16 Segher Boessenkool <se...@kernel.crashing.org>
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.dg/pr59833.c: Add -fsignaling-nans to options.
* gcc.dg/pr61441.c: Ditto.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr59833.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr61441.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr59833.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr59833.c
index 45fcf7f..c75efde 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr59833.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr59833.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* { dg-do run { target { *-*-linux* *-*-gnu* } } } */
-/* { dg-options "-O0 -lm" } */
+/* { dg-options "-O0 -lm -fsignaling-nans" } */
/* { dg-add-options ieee } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target issignaling } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr61441.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr61441.c
index 1b0f181..9408e85 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr61441.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr61441.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* { dg-do run { target { *-*-linux* *-*-gnu* } } } */
-/* { dg-options "-O1 -lm -fexcess-precision=standard" } */
+/* { dg-options "-O1 -lm -fexcess-precision=standard -fsignaling-nans" } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target issignaling } */
#define _GNU_SOURCE
--
1.9.3
