Here build_data_member_initialization got confused by the
initialization of a field of local variable f and thought it was
initializing a field of S; when we then went looking for that field in
S, we didn't find it, and crashed.  But if the target of an
initialization is a member of a VAR_DECL, it can't be part of *this,
so we should ignore it here.

Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit 227008348567729cd124bea44227771681361c40
Author: Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon Feb 13 15:09:37 2017 -0500

            PR c++/79461 - ICE with lambda in constexpr constructor
    
            * constexpr.c (build_data_member_initialization): Ignore
            initialization of a local variable.

diff --git a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
index bfdde9e..004bb45 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
@@ -379,6 +379,9 @@ build_data_member_initialization (tree t, 
vec<constructor_elt, va_gc> **vec)
   if (TREE_CODE (member) == COMPONENT_REF)
     {
       tree aggr = TREE_OPERAND (member, 0);
+      if (TREE_CODE (aggr) == VAR_DECL)
+       /* Initializing a local variable, don't add anything.  */
+       return true;
       if (TREE_CODE (aggr) != COMPONENT_REF)
        /* Normal member initialization.  */
        member = TREE_OPERAND (member, 1);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda15.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda15.C
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7e05481
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda15.C
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+// PR c++/79461
+// { dg-options -std=c++1z }
+
+struct S {
+  constexpr S(int i) {
+    auto f = [i]{};
+  }
+};
+int main() {}
+

Reply via email to