> I was pointing out that on gcc-6, aarch64-linux is using x86-64 > system file too. Since I used gcc-6 for the original testing on > freebsd, that's where it came from. It's been changed on trunk, but > nobody backported those changes to gcc-6. It was obviously "good > enough" and a "placeholder" as indicated in the nearby comment.
Well, that's a bad practice that we want to fix rather than copy :-) > If you want, I can create a duplicate file with a different name. > Or I can add a "placeholder" comment like we see on aarch64-linux. > Adding a new system file would not change the end result but if you > like it more, I'll submit a new patch that creates this new system > file. Given that the more recent trend is to merge more these system files as opposed to systematically breaking them, I'd recommend renaming the file to system-freedbsd and change the definition of Default_Bit_Order which will be needed sooner or later in any case (if not already). Arno
