On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 02:23:12PM -0800, Carl E. Love wrote:
> The GCC 6 branch for the back port of the following two mainline commits
> was approved and committed to GCC 6.  The following patch is the back
> port for the two commits for the GCC 5 branch.  The only difference
> relative to the GCC 6 patch is the line numbers.

> Is the patch OK for gcc 5 branch?  

Sure :-)  (But, typo in the changelog, see below).


Segher


> 2017-02-03  Carl Love  <c...@us.ibm.com>
> 
>         Backport of two commits from mainline, r244943 and r244904,
>         dated 017-01-26 and 2017-01-25 respectively

                ^^^ I doubt that date.  A strange Y2K remnant?

>         * config/rs6000/rs6000-c (altivec_overloaded_builtins): Fix order
>         of entries for ALTIVEC_BUILTIN_VEC_PACKS.  Remove bogus entries
>         for P8V_BUILTIN_VEC_VGBBD.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
> 2017-02-03  Carl Love  <c...@us.ibm.com>
>         * gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-3-p8.c:  Add new testfile for missing
>         vec_packs built-in tests.

Reply via email to