> On Jan 30, 2017, at 3:23 PM, Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@foss.arm.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Maxim,
> 
> On 30/01/17 12:06, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>> This patch enables prefetching at -O3 for aarch64 cores that set 
>> "simultaneous prefetches" parameter above 0.  There are currently no such 
>> settings, so this patch doesn't change default code generation.
>> 
>> I'm now working on improvements to -fprefetch-loop-arrays pass to make it 
>> suitable for -O2.  I'll post this work in the next month.
>> 
>> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu and aarch64-linux-gnu.
>> 
> 
> Are you aiming to get this in for GCC 8?
> I have one small comment on this patch:
> 
> +  /* Enable sw prefetching at -O3 for CPUS that have prefetch, and we
> +     have deemed it beneficial (signified by setting
> +     prefetch.num_slots to 1 or more).  */
> +  if (flag_prefetch_loop_arrays < 0
> +      && HAVE_prefetch
> 
> HAVE_prefetch will always be true on aarch64.
> I imagine midend code that had logic like this would need this check, but 
> aarch64-specific code shouldn't need it.

Agree, I'll remove HAVE_prefetch.

This pattern was copied from other backends, and HAVE_prefetch is most likely a 
historical artifact.

--
Maxim Kuvyrkov
www.linaro.org

Reply via email to