On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 09:01:24AM +0000, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 22/01/17 18:41, Per Bothner wrote: > > In my opinion, all/most of these should be restored. > > Because of the historical interest? That's a good point, and perhaps > I was too hasty. Sorry.
But then it should be probably moved somewhere where Gerald won't have to
spent time maintaining those pages (verification of URLs in there, updating
them when they are moved etc.). Also to make it clear that GCJ is no longer
supported.
Jakub
