Hi Paul,
you are right. The patch implements the feature of pointer components in
derived type coarrays and was motivated by 78781. The "regression" (like so
many) is that without the patch the compiler ICEs while it errored before. I
have given up to complain everytime when a pr is called a regression instead of
a feature request.
Regards,
Andre
On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 15:06:20 +0100
Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Andre and Dominique,
>
> Apart from s/allows there allocation/allows their allocation/ this is
> OK for trunk.
>
> Given the scale of the patch, can this really be a regression?
>
> Thanks
>
> Paul
>
>
> On 7 January 2017 at 13:47, Dominique d'Humières <domi...@lps.ens.fr> wrote:
> > I have this patch in my working tree and it works as expected.
> >
> >> Also fixes pr78935.
> >
> > Confirmed.
> >
> > Thanks for the patch,
> >
> > Dominique
> >
>
>
>
--
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
