On 05/12/16 15:05, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
On 01/12/16 17:25, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
On 09/11/16 10:11, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
Hi,
This patch refactors the implementation of the ARM ACLE CRC builtins to
use the builtin framework.
Is this OK for trunk?
Regards,
Andre
gcc/ChangeLog
2016-11-09 Andre Vieira <andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com>
* config/arm/arm-builtins.c (arm_unsigned_binop_qualifiers): New.
(UBINOP_QUALIFIERS): New.
(si_UP): Define.
(acle_builtin_data): New. Change comment.
(arm_builtins): Remove ARM_BUILTIN_CRC32B, ARM_BUILTIN_CRC32H,
ARM_BUILTIN_CRC32W, ARM_BUILTIN_CRC32CB, ARM_BUILTIN_CRC32CH,
ARM_BUILTIN_CRC32CW. Add ARM_BUILTIN_ACLE_BASE and include
arm_acle_builtins.def.
(ARM_BUILTIN_ACLE_PATTERN_START): Define.
(arm_init_acle_builtins): New.
(CRC32_BUILTIN): Remove.
(bdesc_2arg): Remove entries for crc32b, crc32h, crc32w,
crc32cb, crc32ch and crc32cw.
(arm_init_crc32_builtins): Remove.
(arm_init_builtins): Use arm_init_acle_builtins rather
than arm_init_crc32_builtins.
(arm_expand_acle_builtin): New.
(arm_expand_builtin): Use 'arm_expand_acle_builtin'.
* config/arm/arm_acle_builtins.def: New.
Hi,
Reworked this patch based on the changes made in [1/6]. No changes to
ChangeLog.
Is this OK?
Ok assuming normal bootstrap and regtest on an arm-none-linux-gnueabihf target.
Thanks,
Kyrill
Cheers,
Andre
Hi,
I had a typo in one of the range checks was using ARM_BUILTIN_ACLE_MAX
where it should've been ARM_BUILTIN_ACLE_BASE.
Cheers,
Andre