On 12/27/2016 07:18 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > On 12/27/2016 09:26 AM, Martin Liška wrote: >> Without RejectNegative one can cause an ICE in the compiler. >> Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests. >> >> Ready to be installed? >> Martin > > Any chance you can also fix the manual to fully document the > -fstrong-eval-order= form of the option? It doesn't currently list > that or what the possible enum values are. I assume > -fno-strong-eval-order is a synonym for -fstrong-eval-order=none ? > > -Sandra >
Hello. I've just installed the patch. To be honest, I'm not familiar with the option, I guess Jason would be the right person to add documentation entry for the that. As I've read other options allowing 'none' value, all of them have RejectNegative flag set and do not allow synonyms. Thanks, Martin
