> How specifically does this fix the problem. I suspect you're just > papering over the bug by changing the order of thread processing. > > You'll note that when a thread is canceled we call the > paths.unordered_remove without incrementing i. AFAICT you're just > changing order in which paths out of the array. > > > Jeff
Please check my explanation in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78879#c11 Thanks! Yuan, Pengfei
