On 20/12/16 17:30, Richard Biener wrote:
On December 20, 2016 5:01:19 PM GMT+01:00, Kyrill Tkachov
<kyrylo.tkac...@foss.arm.com> wrote:
Hi all,
The testcase in this patch generates bogus assembly for arm with -O1
-mfloat-abi=soft:
strd r4, [#0, r3]
This is due to non-canonical RTL being generated during expansion:
(set (mem:DI (plus:SI (const_int 0 [0])
(reg/f:SI 153)) [0 MEM[symbol: a, index: _26, offset: 0B]+0 S8 A64])
(reg:DI 154))
Note the (plus (const_int 0) (reg)). This is being generated in
gen_addr_rtx in tree-ssa-address.c
where it creates an explicit PLUS rtx through gen_rtx_PLUS, which
doesn't try to canonicalise its arguments
or simplify. The correct thing to do is to use simplify_gen_binary that
will handle all this properly.
But it has to match up the validity check which passes down exactly the same
RTL(?) Or does this stem from propagation simplifying a MEM after IVOPTs?
You mean TARGET_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS_P? Yes, it gets passed on to that, but the
arm implementation of that
doesn't try to handle non-canonical RTL (plus (const0_rtx) (reg) is not
canonical).
Or do you mean some other check?
Thanks,
Kyrill
I didn't change the other gen_rtx_PLUS calls in this function as their
results is later used in XEXP operations
that seem to rely on a PLUS expression being explicitly produced, but
this particular call doesn't, so it's okay
to change it. With this patch the sane assembly is generated:
strd r4, [r3]
Bootstrapped and tested on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf, x86_64,
aarch64-none-linux-gnu.
Ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Kyrill
2016-12-20 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com>
* tree-ssa-address.c (gen_addr_rtx): Use simplify_gen_binary to add
*addr to act_elem.
2016-12-20 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com>
* gcc.dg/20161219.c: New test.
