On 12/06/2016 01:10 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
In this PR, we have two registers with "replace" set for them. When
processing the first, we delete its setter, which happens to be the
only use of the other register. In the second iteration we then assert
that the other register has a use, which would be reasonable if we
hadn't deleted it.
The following fixes it. Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux, ok?
Sure, Bernd.
Please, use effective target Uros proposed in the test (btw I recently
did the same mistake with one my test too).
