Hi Tamar,
On 5 December 2016 at 16:32, Kyrill Tkachov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 05/12/16 10:39, Tamar Christina wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> This patch fixes test failures on arm-none-eabi.
>> Poly64 was being used by files that were not supposed
>> to be testing poly64 types.
>>
>> I have added a new MACRO that must be defined in addition
>> to having CRYPTO available before use of Poly64 types are
>> allowed in the header arm-neon-ref.h.
>>
>> Ok for trunk?
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/
>> 2016-12-01 Tamar Christina <[email protected]>
>>
>> * gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/arm-neon-ref.h: Gate use
>> of Poly64 on USE_CRYPTO_TYPES.
>> * gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/p64_p128.c: Define
>> USE_CRYPTO_TYPES.
>> * gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vreinterpret_p128.c:
>> Likewise.
>> * gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vreinterpret_p64.c:
>> Likewise.
>
>
> Ok, but please make sure the line length in the ChangeLog doesn't go over 80
> characters.
> Kyrill
Since 'expected_poly64x[12]' isn't used, there is no need to declare it,
and the attached patch seems to work (tested only on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf
--target-board=-mthumb/-march=armv8-a/-mfpu=crypto-neon-fp-armv8/-mfloat-abi=hard
All the tests for poly64 use dedicated output buffers, at least for the moment.
Does my patch break aarch64?
Christophe
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/arm-neon-ref.h b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/arm-neon-ref.h
index beaf6ac..4728639 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/arm-neon-ref.h
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/arm-neon-ref.h
@@ -99,13 +99,6 @@ extern size_t strlen(const char *);
fprintf(stderr, "CHECKED %s %s\n", STR(VECT_TYPE(T, W, N)), MSG); \
}
-#if defined (__ARM_FEATURE_CRYPTO)
-#define CHECK_CRYPTO(MSG,T,W,N,FMT,EXPECTED,COMMENT) \
- CHECK(MSG,T,W,N,FMT,EXPECTED,COMMENT)
-#else
-#define CHECK_CRYPTO(MSG,T,W,N,FMT,EXPECTED,COMMENT)
-#endif
-
/* Floating-point variant. */
#define CHECK_FP(MSG,T,W,N,FMT,EXPECTED,COMMENT) \
{ \
@@ -198,9 +191,6 @@ extern ARRAY(expected, uint, 32, 2);
extern ARRAY(expected, uint, 64, 1);
extern ARRAY(expected, poly, 8, 8);
extern ARRAY(expected, poly, 16, 4);
-#if defined (__ARM_FEATURE_CRYPTO)
-extern ARRAY(expected, poly, 64, 1);
-#endif
extern ARRAY(expected, hfloat, 16, 4);
extern ARRAY(expected, hfloat, 32, 2);
extern ARRAY(expected, hfloat, 64, 1);
@@ -214,9 +204,6 @@ extern ARRAY(expected, uint, 32, 4);
extern ARRAY(expected, uint, 64, 2);
extern ARRAY(expected, poly, 8, 16);
extern ARRAY(expected, poly, 16, 8);
-#if defined (__ARM_FEATURE_CRYPTO)
-extern ARRAY(expected, poly, 64, 2);
-#endif
extern ARRAY(expected, hfloat, 16, 8);
extern ARRAY(expected, hfloat, 32, 4);
extern ARRAY(expected, hfloat, 64, 2);
@@ -233,7 +220,6 @@ extern ARRAY(expected, hfloat, 64, 2);
CHECK(test_name, uint, 64, 1, PRIx64, EXPECTED, comment); \
CHECK(test_name, poly, 8, 8, PRIx8, EXPECTED, comment); \
CHECK(test_name, poly, 16, 4, PRIx16, EXPECTED, comment); \
- CHECK_CRYPTO(test_name, poly, 64, 1, PRIx64, EXPECTED, comment); \
CHECK_FP(test_name, float, 32, 2, PRIx32, EXPECTED, comment); \
\
CHECK(test_name, int, 8, 16, PRIx8, EXPECTED, comment); \
@@ -246,7 +232,6 @@ extern ARRAY(expected, hfloat, 64, 2);
CHECK(test_name, uint, 64, 2, PRIx64, EXPECTED, comment); \
CHECK(test_name, poly, 8, 16, PRIx8, EXPECTED, comment); \
CHECK(test_name, poly, 16, 8, PRIx16, EXPECTED, comment); \
- CHECK_CRYPTO(test_name, poly, 64, 2, PRIx64, EXPECTED, comment); \
CHECK_FP(test_name, float, 32, 4, PRIx32, EXPECTED, comment); \
} \
