On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 11:56:02 +0100
Janus Weil <ja...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:

> Hi Steve,
> 
> > Regression tested on x86_64-*-freebsd.  OK to commit?  
> 
> the patch is certainly ok.
> 
> Just my usual request for a meaningful test-case name: This one could
> be class_result_4.f90. (I don't want to be pedantic about this, but in
> a growing testsuite of 4000+ files, I really think it makes sense to
> have meaningful names. It does have various advantages and, to be
> honest, I don't see any disadvantage).

Seconded!

- Andre
> Thanks for the patch,
> Janus
> 
> 
> 
> > 2016-11-23  Steven G. Kargl  <ka...@gcc.gnu.org>
> >
> >         PR fortran/78500
> >         * expr.c (gfc_check_vardef_contextm): YANPD
> >         * interface.c (matching_typebound_op): Ditto.
> >
> > 2016-11-23  Steven G. Kargl  <ka...@gcc.gnu.org>
> >
> >         PR fortran/78500
> >         * gfortran.dg/pr78500.f90: New test.
> >
> >
> > Index: gcc/fortran/expr.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- gcc/fortran/expr.c  (revision 242789)
> > +++ gcc/fortran/expr.c  (working copy)
> > @@ -5291,7 +5291,8 @@ gfc_check_vardef_context (gfc_expr* e, b
> >       component.  Note that (normal) assignment to procedure pointers is not
> >       possible.  */
> >    check_intentin = !own_scope;
> > -  ptr_component = (sym->ts.type == BT_CLASS && CLASS_DATA (sym))
> > +  ptr_component = (sym->ts.type == BT_CLASS && sym->ts.u.derived
> > +                  && CLASS_DATA (sym))
> >                   ? CLASS_DATA (sym)->attr.class_pointer :
> > sym->attr.pointer; for (ref = e->ref; ref && check_intentin; ref =
> > ref->next) {
> > Index: gcc/fortran/interface.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- gcc/fortran/interface.c     (revision 242789)
> > +++ gcc/fortran/interface.c     (working copy)
> > @@ -3885,7 +3885,7 @@ matching_typebound_op (gfc_expr** tb_bas
> >
> >         if (base->expr->ts.type == BT_CLASS)
> >           {
> > -           if (CLASS_DATA (base->expr) == NULL
> > +           if (!base->expr->ts.u.derived || CLASS_DATA (base->expr) == NULL
> >                 || !gfc_expr_attr (base->expr).class_ok)
> >               continue;
> >             derived = CLASS_DATA (base->expr)->ts.u.derived;
> > Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr78500.f90
> > ===================================================================
> > --- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr78500.f90       (nonexistent)
> > +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr78500.f90       (working copy)
> > @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
> > +! { dg-do compile }
> > +class(t) function f() ! { dg-error "must be dummy, allocatable or
> > pointer" }
> > +   f = 1              ! { dg-error "variable must not be polymorphic" }
> > +end
> > +
> >
> > --
> > Steve  


-- 
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de 

Reply via email to