When construction a :? or fold expression that requires a third expression only the first and second were explicitly checked to not be NULL. Since the third expression is also required in these constructs it needs to be explicitly checked and rejected when missing. Otherwise the demangler will crash once it tries to d_print the NULL component. Added two examples to demangle-expected of strings that would crash before this fix.
Found by American Fuzzy Lop (afl) fuzzer. --- libiberty/ChangeLog | 7 +++++++ libiberty/cp-demangle.c | 4 ++++ libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected | 8 ++++++++ 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+) diff --git a/libiberty/ChangeLog b/libiberty/ChangeLog index 41f3405..43617e4 100644 --- a/libiberty/ChangeLog +++ b/libiberty/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +2016-11-15 Mark Wielaard <m...@klomp.org> + + * cp-demangle.c (d_expression_1): Make sure third expression + exists for ?: and fold expressions. + * testsuite/demangle-expected: Add examples of strings that could + crash the demangler because of missing expression. + 2016-11-14 Mark Wielaard <m...@klomp.org> * cplus-dem.c (demangle_signature): After 'H', template function, diff --git a/libiberty/cp-demangle.c b/libiberty/cp-demangle.c index e239155..45663fe 100644 --- a/libiberty/cp-demangle.c +++ b/libiberty/cp-demangle.c @@ -3415,6 +3415,8 @@ d_expression_1 (struct d_info *di) first = d_expression_1 (di); second = d_expression_1 (di); third = d_expression_1 (di); + if (third == NULL) + return NULL; } else if (code[0] == 'f') { @@ -3422,6 +3424,8 @@ d_expression_1 (struct d_info *di) first = d_operator_name (di); second = d_expression_1 (di); third = d_expression_1 (di); + if (third == NULL) + return NULL; } else if (code[0] == 'n') { diff --git a/libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected b/libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected index 236161c..af491d8 100644 --- a/libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected +++ b/libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected @@ -4626,3 +4626,11 @@ _$_H1R # Could crash _Q8ccQ4M2e. _Q8ccQ4M2e. + +# fold-expression with missing third component could crash. +_Z12binary_rightIJLi1ELi2ELi3EEEv1AIXfRplT_LiEEE +_Z12binary_rightIJLi1ELi2ELi3EEEv1AIXfRplT_LiEEE + +# ?: expression with missing third component could crash. +AquT_quT_4mxautouT_4mxxx +AquT_quT_4mxautouT_4mxxx -- 1.8.3.1