On 10/14/2016 08:28 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 10/12/2016 09:27 PM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
Yes, something like "if max_skip >= func_size, temporarily lower
max_skip to func_size-1" (because otherwise we can create padding
bigger-or-equal to the entire function in size, which is stupid
- it's better to just put the function in that space).
This would be a nice.
That would be this patch. Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux, ok?
Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-10/msg01187.html
Bernd
